↓ Skip to main content

Fast track multi-discipline treatment (FTMDT trial) versus conventional treatment in colorectal cancer--the design of a prospective randomized controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fast track multi-discipline treatment (FTMDT trial) versus conventional treatment in colorectal cancer--the design of a prospective randomized controlled study
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-11-494
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiao-Jiao Zhou, Jun Li, Xiao-Jiang Ying, Yong-Mao Song, Rong Chen, Gang Chen, Min Yan, Ke-Feng Ding

Abstract

Laparoscopy-assisted surgery, fast-track perioperative treatment are both increasingly used in colorectal cancer treatment, for their short-time benefits of enhanced recovery and short hospital stays. However, the benefits of the integration of the Laparoscopy-assisted surgery, fast-track perioperative treatment, and even with the Xelox chemotherapy, are still unknown. In this study, the three treatments integration is defined as "Fast Track Multi-Discipline Treatment Model" for colorectal cancer and this model extends the benefits to the whole treatment process of colorectal cancer. The main purpose of the study is to explore the feasibility of "Fast Track Multi-Discipline Treatment" model in treatment of colorectal cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,152,153
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,478
of 8,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,783
of 239,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#76
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.