↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
593 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
770 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-1-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karine Gravel, France Légaré, Ian D Graham

Abstract

Shared decision-making is advocated because of its potential to improve the quality of the decision-making process for patients and ultimately, patient outcomes. However, current evidence suggests that shared decision-making has not yet been widely adopted by health professionals. Therefore, a systematic review was performed on the barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice as perceived by health professionals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 770 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 2%
United Kingdom 11 1%
Spain 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Colombia 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 722 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 133 17%
Researcher 126 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 14%
Student > Bachelor 83 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 7%
Other 185 24%
Unknown 86 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 269 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 82 11%
Social Sciences 81 11%
Psychology 78 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 4%
Other 120 16%
Unknown 113 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,547,051
of 24,834,604 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#280
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,696
of 81,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,834,604 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them