↓ Skip to main content

Field evaluation of the establishment potential of wmelpop Wolbachia in Australia and Vietnam for dengue control

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field evaluation of the establishment potential of wmelpop Wolbachia in Australia and Vietnam for dengue control
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-1174-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tran Hien Nguyen, H. Le Nguyen, Thu Yen Nguyen, Sinh Nam Vu, Nhu Duong Tran, T. N. Le, Quang Mai Vien, T. C. Bui, Huu Tho Le, Simon Kutcher, Tim P. Hurst, T. T. H. Duong, Jason A. L. Jeffery, Jonathan M. Darbro, B. H. Kay, Iñaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Jean Popovici, Brian L. Montgomery, Andrew P. Turley, Flora Zigterman, Helen Cook, Peter E. Cook, Petrina H. Johnson, Peter A. Ryan, Chris J. Paton, Scott A. Ritchie, Cameron P. Simmons, Scott L. O’Neill, Ary A. Hoffmann

Abstract

Introduced Wolbachia bacteria can influence the susceptibility of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes to arboviral infections as well as having detrimental effects on host fitness. Previous field trials demonstrated that the wMel strain of Wolbachia effectively and durably invades Ae. aegypti populations. Here we report on trials of a second strain, wMelPop-PGYP Wolbachia, in field sites in northern Australia (Machans Beach and Babinda) and central Vietnam (Tri Nguyen, Hon Mieu Island), each with contrasting natural Ae. aegypti densities. Mosquitoes were released at the adult or pupal stages for different lengths of time at the sites depending on changes in Wolbachia frequency as assessed through PCR assays of material collected through Biogents-Sentinel (BG-S) traps and ovitraps. Adult numbers were also monitored through BG-S traps. Changes in Wolbachia frequency were compared across hamlets or house blocks. Releases of adult wMelPop-Ae. aegypti resulted in the transient invasion of wMelPop in all three field sites. Invasion at the Australian sites was heterogeneous, reflecting a slower rate of invasion in locations where background mosquito numbers were high. In contrast, invasion across Tri Nguyen was relatively uniform. After cessation of releases, the frequency of wMelPop declined in all sites, most rapidly in Babinda and Tri Nguyen. Within Machans Beach the rate of decrease varied among areas, and wMelPop was detected for several months in an area with a relatively low mosquito density. These findings highlight challenges associated with releasing Wolbachia-Ae. aegypti combinations with low fitness, albeit strong virus interference properties, as a means of sustainable control of dengue virus transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Unknown 281 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 16%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Master 36 13%
Other 14 5%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 54 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Environmental Science 7 2%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 59 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,070,312
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#361
of 5,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,457
of 290,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#4
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.