You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hundreds of putatively functional small open reading frames in Drosophila
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2011-12-11-r118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emmanuel Ladoukakis, Vini Pereira, Emile G Magny, Adam Eyre-Walker, Juan Pablo Couso |
| Abstract |
The relationship between DNA sequence and encoded information is still an unsolved puzzle. The number of protein-coding genes in higher eukaryotes identified by genome projects is lower than was expected, while a considerable amount of putatively non-coding transcription has been detected. Functional small open reading frames (smORFs) are known to exist in several organisms. However, coding sequence detection methods are biased against detecting such very short open reading frames. Thus, a substantial number of non-canonical coding regions encoding short peptides might await characterization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,210,007
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#911
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,208
of 246,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#6
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.