↓ Skip to main content

Biomarkers from distinct biological pathways improve early risk stratification in medical emergency patients: the multinational, prospective, observational TRIAGE study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomarkers from distinct biological pathways improve early risk stratification in medical emergency patients: the multinational, prospective, observational TRIAGE study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-1098-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Schuetz, Pierre Hausfater, Devendra Amin, Adina Amin, Sebastian Haubitz, Lukas Faessler, Alexander Kutz, Antoinette Conca, Barbara Reutlinger, Pauline Canavaggio, Gabrielle Sauvin, Maguy Bernard, Andreas Huber, Beat Mueller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 33 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Computer Science 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 41 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,455,082
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,062
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,535
of 401,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#349
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.