↓ Skip to main content

Ribonucleotide reduction - horizontal transfer of a required function spans all three domains

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ribonucleotide reduction - horizontal transfer of a required function spans all three domains
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Lundin, Simonetta Gribaldo, Eduard Torrents, Britt-Marie Sjöberg, Anthony M Poole

Abstract

Ribonucleotide reduction is the only de novo pathway for synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides, the building blocks of DNA. The reaction is catalysed by ribonucleotide reductases (RNRs), an ancient enzyme family comprised of three classes. Each class has distinct operational constraints, and are broadly distributed across organisms from all three domains, though few class I RNRs have been identified in archaeal genomes, and classes II and III likewise appear rare across eukaryotes. In this study, we examine whether this distribution is best explained by presence of all three classes in the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA), or by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of RNR genes. We also examine to what extent environmental factors may have impacted the distribution of RNR classes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2011.
All research outputs
#3,414,665
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#920
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,494
of 191,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#12
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.