You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-7-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsay M Sabik, Reidar K Lie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 349 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 93 | 25% |
| Researcher | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 19% |
| Unknown | 66 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 57 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 13% |
| Unknown | 78 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,192,842
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#956
of 2,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,921
of 169,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.