You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What is an appropriate material to use with a covering technique to prevent the recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-9-74 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hidetaka Uramoto, Fumihiro Tanaka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,284,439
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#17
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,445
of 227,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.