↓ Skip to main content

Validation of a high resolution NGS method for detecting spinal muscular atrophy carriers among phase 3 participants in the 1000 Genomes Project

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of a high resolution NGS method for detecting spinal muscular atrophy carriers among phase 3 participants in the 1000 Genomes Project
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12881-015-0246-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica L. Larson, Ari J. Silver, Dalin Chan, Carlos Borroto, Brett Spurrier, Lee M. Silver

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the most common pan-ethnic cause of early childhood death due to mutations in a single gene, SMN1. Most chromosome 5 homologs have a functional gene and dysfunctional copy, SMN2, with a single synonymous base substitution that results in faulty RNA splicing. However, the copy number of SMN1 and SMN2 is highly variable, and one in 60 adults worldwide are SMA carriers. Although population-wide screening is recommended, current SMA carrier tests have not been incorporated into targeted gene panels. Here we describe a novel computational protocol for determining SMA carrier status based solely on individual exome data. Our method utilizes a Bayesian hierarchical model to quantify an individual's carrier probability given only his or her SMN1 and SMN2 reads at six loci of interest. We find complete concordance with results obtained with the current qPCR-based testing standard in known SMA carriers and affecteds. We applied our protocol to the phase 3 cohort of the 1,000 Genomes Project and found carrier frequencies in multiple populations consistent with the present literature. Our process is a convenient, robust alternative to qPCR, which can easily be integrated into the analysis of large multi-gene NGS carrier screens.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Computer Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#375
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,304
of 295,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.