You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A framework and a measurement instrument for sustainability of work practices in long-term care
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-314 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah S Slaghuis, Mathilde MH Strating, Roland A Bal, Anna P Nieboer |
Abstract |
In health care, many organizations are working on quality improvement and/or innovation of their care practices. Although the effectiveness of improvement processes has been studied extensively, little attention has been given to sustainability of the changed work practices after implementation. The objective of this study is to develop a theoretical framework and measurement instrument for sustainability. To this end sustainability is conceptualized with two dimensions: routinization and institutionalization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Zambia | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 81 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 22% |
Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 20% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Psychology | 6 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2012.
All research outputs
#13,126,617
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,420
of 7,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,760
of 125,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#46
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.