↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Diagnosis of neglected tropical diseases among patients with persistent digestive disorders (diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain ≥14 days): a multi-country, prospective, non-experimental case–c…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Diagnosis of neglected tropical diseases among patients with persistent digestive disorders (diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain ≥14 days): a multi-country, prospective, non-experimental case–control study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12879-015-1160-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katja Polman, Sören L. Becker, Emilie Alirol, Nisha K. Bhatta, Narayan R. Bhattarai, Emmanuel Bottieau, Martin W. Bratschi, Sakib Burza, Jean T. Coulibaly, Mama N. Doumbia, Ninon S. Horié, Jan Jacobs, Basudha Khanal, Aly Landouré, Yodi Mahendradhata, Filip Meheus, Pascal Mertens, Fransiska Meyanti, Elsa H. Murhandarwati, Eliézer K. N’Goran, Rosanna W. Peeling, Raffaella Ravinetto, Suman Rijal, Moussa Sacko, Rénion Saye, Pierre H. H. Schneeberger, Céline Schurmans, Kigbafori D. Silué, Jarir A. Thobari, Mamadou S. Traoré, Lisette van Lieshout, Harry van Loen, Kristien Verdonck, Lutz von Müller, Cédric P. Yansouni, Joel A. Yao, Patrick K. Yao, Peiling Yap, Marleen Boelaert, François Chappuis, Jürg Utzinger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Professor 2 3%
Student > Master 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 53 77%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 56 81%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,828,066
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,077
of 7,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,700
of 285,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#89
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.