You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sensitivity of a national coronial database for monitoring unnatural deaths among ex-prisoners in Australia
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-4-450 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jessica Y Andrews, Simon Forsyth, Jessica Wade, Stuart A Kinner |
Abstract |
The period immediately after release from custody is a time of marked vulnerability and increased risk of death for ex-prisoners. Despite this, there is currently no routine, national system for monitoring ex-prisoner mortality in Australia. This study subsequently aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of Australia's National Coroners Information System (NCIS) for identifying reportable deaths among prisoners and ex-prisoners. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 1 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,011,199
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,584
of 4,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,606
of 140,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#31
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.