↓ Skip to main content

Application of the EVEX resource to event extraction and network construction: Shared Task entry and result analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of the EVEX resource to event extraction and network construction: Shared Task entry and result analysis
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-16-s16-s3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Hakala, Sofie Van Landeghem, Tapio Salakoski, Yves Van de Peer, Filip Ginter

Abstract

Modern methods for mining biomolecular interactions from literature typically make predictions based solely on the immediate textual context, in effect a single sentence. No prior work has been published on extending this context to the information automatically gathered from the whole biomedical literature. Thus, our motivation for this study is to explore whether mutually supporting evidence, aggregated across several documents can be utilized to improve the performance of the state-of-the-art event extraction systems. In the GE task, our re-ranking approach led to a modest performance increase and resulted in the first rank of the official Shared Task results with 50.97% F-score. Additionally, in this paper we explore and evaluate the usage of distributed vector representations for this challenge. For the GRN task, we were able to produce a gene regulatory network from the EVEX data, warranting the use of such generic large-scale text mining data in network biology settings. A detailed performance and error analysis provides more insight into the relatively low recall rates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Computer Science 4 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Decision Sciences 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,828,066
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,045
of 7,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,512
of 284,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#102
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.