↓ Skip to main content

From knowing our needs to enacting change: findings from community consultations with indigenous communities in Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From knowing our needs to enacting change: findings from community consultations with indigenous communities in Bangladesh
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12939-015-0264-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sameera Hussain, Ana Lorena Ruano, Atiya Rahman, Sabina Faiz Rashid, Peter S. Hill

Abstract

Indigenous peoples are among the most marginalized peoples in the world due to issues relating to well-being, political representation, and economic production. The research consortium Goals and Governance for Global Health (Go4Health) conducted a community consultation process among marginalized groups across the global South aimed at including their voices in the global discourse around health in the post-2015 development agenda. This paper presents findings from the consultations carried out among indigenous communities in Bangladesh. For this qualitative study, our research team consulted the Tripura and Mro communities in Bandarban district living in the isolated Chittagong Hill Tracts region. Community members, leaders, and key informants working in health service delivery were interviewed. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Our findings show that remoteness shapes the daily lives of the communities, and their lack of access to natural resources and basic services prevents them from following health promotion messages. The communities feel that their needs are impossible to secure in a politically indifferent and sometimes hostile environment. Communities are keen to participate and work with duty bearers in creating the conditions that will lead to their improved quality of life. Clear policies that recognize the status of indigenous peoples are necessary in the Bangladeshi context to allow for the development of services and infrastructure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Librarian 6 7%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 21%
Social Sciences 14 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Arts and Humanities 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,430,119
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,726
of 1,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,668
of 284,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#44
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.