↓ Skip to main content

The rising incidence of severe sepsis based on administrative data — real change or coding-driven bias?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The rising incidence of severe sepsis based on administrative data — real change or coding-driven bias?
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-1113-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lavi Oud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#2,006,335
of 18,475,574 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,777
of 5,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,174
of 292,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#191
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,475,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.