↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of pre-workout nitric oxide stimulating dietary supplements on skeletal muscle oxygen saturation, blood nitrate/nitrite, lipid peroxidation, and upper body exercise performance in…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of pre-workout nitric oxide stimulating dietary supplements on skeletal muscle oxygen saturation, blood nitrate/nitrite, lipid peroxidation, and upper body exercise performance in resistance trained men
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-7-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J Bloomer, Tyler M Farney, John F Trepanowski, Cameron G McCarthy, Robert E Canale, Brian K Schilling

Abstract

We compared Glycine Propionyl-L-Carnitine (GlycoCarn(R)) and three different pre-workout nutritional supplements on measures of skeletal muscle oxygen saturation (StO2), blood nitrate/nitrite (NOx), lactate (HLa), malondialdehyde (MDA), and exercise performance in men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 174 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 19%
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 53 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 32 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,238,866
of 25,032,929 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#519
of 937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,679
of 434,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#481
of 854 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,032,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 854 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.