↓ Skip to main content

Comparative field evaluation of combinations of long-lasting insecticide treated nets and indoor residual spraying, relative to either method alone, for malaria prevention in an area where the main…

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative field evaluation of combinations of long-lasting insecticide treated nets and indoor residual spraying, relative to either method alone, for malaria prevention in an area where the main vector is Anopheles arabiensis
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fredros O Okumu, Edgar Mbeyela, Godfrey Lingamba, Jason Moore, Alex J Ntamatungiro, Deo R Kavishe, Michael G Kenward, Elizabeth Turner, Lena M Lorenz, Sarah J Moore

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 208 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 21%
Student > Master 45 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 12 6%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 40 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 51 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,468,612
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,856
of 5,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,414
of 193,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#17
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.