You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of ingesting protein with various forms of carbohydrate following resistance-exercise on substrate availability and markers of anabolism, catabolism, and immunity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-4-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard B Kreider, Conrad P Earnest, Jennifer Lundberg, Christopher Rasmussen, Michael Greenwood, Patricia Cowan, Anthony L Almada |
| Abstract |
Ingestion of carbohydrate (CHO) and protein (PRO) following intense exercise has been reported to increase insulin levels, optimize glycogen resynthesis, enhance PRO synthesis, and lessen the immuno-suppressive effects of intense exercise. Since different forms of CHO have varying glycemic effects, the purpose of this study was to determine whether the type of CHO ingested with PRO following resistance-exercise affects blood glucose availability and insulin levels, markers of anabolism and catabolism, and/or general immune markers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| Belgium | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 273 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 23% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Professor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 68 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 73 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,530,613
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#352
of 887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,868
of 440,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#343
of 856 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 856 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.