You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors influencing the adoption of self-management solutions: an interpretive synthesis of the literature on stakeholder experiences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-015-0350-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Harvey, S. Dopson, R. J. McManus, J. Powell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 19% |
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 17% |
| Psychology | 15 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,622,434
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#829
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,906
of 293,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.