You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: a narrative synthesis protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy A Gifford, Paul Holyoke, Janet E Squires, Douglas Angus, Lucie Brosseau, Mary Egan, Ian D Graham, Carol Miller, Lars Wallin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,430,119
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,782
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,037
of 228,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.