↓ Skip to main content

Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial [ISRCTN43755713]

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial [ISRCTN43755713]
Published in
Critical Care, November 2003
DOI 10.1186/cc2398
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernd Muellejans, Angel López, Michael H Cross, César Bonome, Lachlan Morrison, Andrew JT Kirkham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 154 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 15%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Master 12 7%
Other 42 26%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 32 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,784,344
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,874
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,930
of 142,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.