↓ Skip to main content

G-8 indicates overall and quality-adjusted survival in older head and neck cancer patients treated with curative radiochemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
G-8 indicates overall and quality-adjusted survival in older head and neck cancer patients treated with curative radiochemotherapy
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1800-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lies Pottel, Michelle Lycke, Tom Boterberg, Hans Pottel, Laurence Goethals, Fréderic Duprez, Sylvie Rottey, Yolande Lievens, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Kurt Geldhof, Véronique Buyse, Khalil Kargar-Samani, Véronique Ghekiere, Philip R. Debruyne

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines concerning the older head and neck cancer (HNCA) patient are lacking. Accurate patient selection for optimal care management is therefore challenging. We examined if geriatric assessment is indicative of long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and overall survival in this unique population. All HNCA patients, aged ≥65 years, eligible for curative radio(chemo)therapy were evaluated with the Geriatric-8 (G-8) questionnaire and a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Euroqol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and survival were collected until 36 months post treatment start. Repeated measures ANOVA was applied to analyse HRQOL evolution in 'fit' and 'vulnerable' patients, defined by G-8. Kaplan-Meier curves and cox proportional hazard analysis were established for determination of the prognostic value of geriatric assessments. Quality-adjusted survival was calculated in both patient subgroups. One hundred patients were recruited. Seventy-two percent of patients were considered vulnerable according to CGA (≥2 abnormal tests). Fit patients maintained a relatively acceptable long-term HRQOL, whilst vulnerable patients showed significantly lower median health states. The difference remained apparent at 36 months. Vulnerability, as classified by G-8 or CGA, came forward as independent predictor for lower EQ-5D index scores. After consideration of confounders, a significantly lower survival was observed in patients defined vulnerable according to G-8, compared to fit patients. A similar trend was seen based on CGA. Calculation of quality-adjusted survival showed significantly less remaining life months in perfect health in vulnerable patients, compared to fit ones. G-8 is indicative of quality-adjusted survival, and should be considered at time of treatment decisions for the older HNCA patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Other 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,430,915
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,427
of 8,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,668
of 284,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#162
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.