↓ Skip to main content

Exploring why quality circles work in primary health care: a realist review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring why quality circles work in primary health care: a realist review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Rohrbasser, Sharon Mickan, Janet Harris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Master 10 15%
Other 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 48%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2015.
All research outputs
#12,820,725
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,351
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,358
of 307,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.