↓ Skip to main content

Mental health literacy measures evaluating knowledge, attitudes and help-seeking: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1060 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mental health literacy measures evaluating knowledge, attitudes and help-seeking: a scoping review
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12888-015-0681-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yifeng Wei, Patrick J. McGrath, Jill Hayden, Stan Kutcher

Abstract

Mental health literacy has received increasing attention as a useful strategy to promote early identification of mental disorders, reduce stigma and enhance help-seeking behaviors. However, despite the abundance of research on mental health literacy interventions, there is the absence of evaluations of current available mental health literacy measures and related psychometrics. We conducted a scoping review to bridge the gap. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and ERIC for relevant studies. We only focused on quantitative studies and English publications, however, we didn't limit study participants, locations, or publication dates. We excluded non-English studies, and did not check the grey literature (non peer-reviewed publications or documents of any type) and therefore may have missed some eligible measures. We located 401 studies that include 69 knowledge measures (14 validated), 111 stigma measures (65 validated), and 35 help-seeking related measures (10 validated). Knowledge measures mainly investigated the ability of illness identification, and factual knowledge of mental disorders such as terminology, etiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and consequences. Stigma measures include those focused on stigma against mental illness or the mentally ill; self-stigma ; experienced stigma; and stigma against mental health treatment and help-seeking. Help-seeking measures included those of help-seeking attitudes, intentions to seek help, and actual help-seeking behaviors. Our review provides a compendium of available mental health literacy measures to facilitate applying existing measures or developing new measures. It also provides a solid database for future research on systematically assessing the quality of the included measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,060 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 1052 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 167 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 12%
Student > Bachelor 124 12%
Researcher 74 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 71 7%
Other 176 17%
Unknown 320 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 275 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 146 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 119 11%
Social Sciences 81 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 1%
Other 85 8%
Unknown 340 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,529,706
of 24,938,276 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#495
of 5,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,569
of 398,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#4
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,938,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.