↓ Skip to main content

Neck exercises, physical and cognitive behavioural-graded activity as a treatment for adult whiplash patients with chronic neck pain: Design of a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neck exercises, physical and cognitive behavioural-graded activity as a treatment for adult whiplash patients with chronic neck pain: Design of a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-274
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inge Ris Hansen, Karen Søgaard, Robin Christensen, Bente Thomsen, Claus Manniche, Birgit Juul-Kristensen

Abstract

Many patients suffer from chronic neck pain following a whiplash injury. A combination of cognitive, behavioural therapy with physiotherapy interventions has been indicated to be effective in the management of patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders. The objective is to present the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a combined individual physical and cognitive behavioural-graded activity program on self-reported general physical function, in addition to neck function, pain, disability and quality of life in patients with chronic neck pain following whiplash injury compared with a matched control group measured at baseline and 4 and 12 months after baseline.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 265 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 23%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 50 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 21%
Sports and Recreations 21 8%
Psychology 14 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 58 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,261,460
of 14,091,558 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,165
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,038
of 207,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#72
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,091,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.