↓ Skip to main content

The novel curcumin analog FLLL32 decreases STAT3 DNA binding activity and expression, and induces apoptosis in osteosarcoma cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The novel curcumin analog FLLL32 decreases STAT3 DNA binding activity and expression, and induces apoptosis in osteosarcoma cell lines
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-11-112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacey L Fossey, Misty D Bear, Jiayuh Lin, Chenglong Li, Eric B Schwartz, Pui-Kai Li, James R Fuchs, Joelle Fenger, William C Kisseberth, Cheryl A London

Abstract

Curcumin is a naturally occurring phenolic compound shown to have a wide variety of antitumor activities; however, it does not attain sufficient blood levels to do so when ingested. Using structure-based design, a novel compound, FLLL32, was generated from curcumin. FLLL32 possesses superior biochemical properties and more specifically targets STAT3, a transcription factor important in tumor cell survival, proliferation, metastasis, and chemotherapy resistance. In our previous work, we found that several canine and human osteosarcoma (OSA) cell lines, but not normal osteoblasts, exhibit constitutive phosphorylation of STAT3. Compared to curcumin, we hypothesized that FLLL32 would be more efficient at inhibiting STAT3 function in OSA cells and that this would result in enhanced downregulation of STAT3 transcriptional targets and subsequent death of OSA cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Chile 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 74 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Chemistry 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2011.
All research outputs
#18,301,870
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,416
of 8,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,271
of 108,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#26
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.