↓ Skip to main content

Training frontline workforce on psychosis management: a prospective study of training effects

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training frontline workforce on psychosis management: a prospective study of training effects
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13033-015-0029-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tore Sørlie, Marit Borg, Karin B. Flage, Ole-Bjørn Kolbjørnsrud, Gunnar B. Haugen, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Torleif Ruud

Abstract

The care situation for persons experiencing severe mental illness is often complex and demands good coordination, communication, and interpersonal relationships among those involved from the primary and specialized mental health care systems. For 15 years, professional care providers from different service levels within the same geographical areas in Norway have been trained together in a 2-year local onsite training program with the aim of increasing skills, joint understanding, and collaboration in their work with individuals experiencing severe mental illness. The key aspects of competence addressed by the training program were measured at baseline, after 1 year, and at the end of the training period. Professional education and experience were also rated at baseline. Data were collected between 1999 and 2005 and were analyzed by estimating a linear mixed model. Results showed a significant increase in participants' experienced competence in all training goals, especially for the understanding of psychosis and relationship building. There was no significant variance at the program level, indicating consistent implementation of local programs. This prospective study indicates that the training program was successful in increasing perceived competence in the areas addressed, and training staff from different service levels together probably contributed to more collaboration. This training model still operates in Norway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 14 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#16,706,673
of 25,358,192 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#570
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,290
of 399,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,358,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.