Title |
Immunoinformatics and epitope prediction in the age of genomic medicine
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Medicine, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13073-015-0245-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Linus Backert, Oliver Kohlbacher |
Abstract |
Immunoinformatics involves the application of computational methods to immunological problems. Prediction of B- and T-cell epitopes has long been the focus of immunoinformatics, given the potential translational implications, and many tools have been developed. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods, an unprecedented wealth of information has become available that requires more-advanced immunoinformatics tools. Based on information from whole-genome sequencing, exome sequencing and RNA sequencing, it is possible to characterize with high accuracy an individual's human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allotype (i.e., the individual set of HLA alleles of the patient), as well as changes arising in the HLA ligandome (the collection of peptides presented by the HLA) owing to genomic variation. This has allowed new opportunities for translational applications of epitope prediction, such as epitope-based design of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines, and personalized cancer immunotherapies. Here, we review a wide range of immunoinformatics tools, with a focus on B- and T-cell epitope prediction. We also highlight fundamental differences in the underlying algorithms and discuss the various metrics employed to assess prediction quality, comparing their strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we discuss the new challenges and opportunities presented by high-throughput data-sets for the field of epitope prediction. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Germany | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 367 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 69 | 18% |
Researcher | 61 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 59 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
Other | 54 | 14% |
Unknown | 51 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 91 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 8% |
Computer Science | 25 | 7% |
Other | 46 | 12% |
Unknown | 68 | 18% |