↓ Skip to main content

ABT-199 (venetoclax) and BCL-2 inhibitors in clinical development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 1,204)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ABT-199 (venetoclax) and BCL-2 inhibitors in clinical development
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13045-015-0224-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shundong Cang, Chaitanya Iragavarapu, John Savooji, Yongping Song, Delong Liu

Abstract

With the advent of new agents targeting CD20, Bruton's tyrosine kinase, and phosphoinositol-3 kinase for chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL), more treatment options exist than ever before. B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) plays a major role in cellular apoptosis and is a druggable target. Small molecule inhibitors of BCL-2 are in active clinical studies. ABT-199 (venetoclax, RG7601, GDC-0199) has been granted breakthrough designation by FDA for relapsed or refractory CLL with 17p deletion. In this review, we summarized the latest clinical development of ABT-199/venetoclax and other novel agents targeting the BCL-2 proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 316 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 22%
Student > Master 45 14%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 70 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 86 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 8%
Chemistry 20 6%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 78 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#996,537
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#43
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,128
of 388,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.