↓ Skip to main content

Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, April 2006
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-4-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo-Ann Mulligan, Damian Walker, Julia Fox-Rushby

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 35%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 12%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,468,944
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#224
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,310
of 66,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them