↓ Skip to main content

Visualisation to enhance biomechanical tuning of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) in stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visualisation to enhance biomechanical tuning of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) in stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-254
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Carse, Roy J Bowers, Barry C Meadows, Philip J Rowe

Abstract

There are a number of gaps in the evidence base for the use of ankle-foot orthoses for stroke patients. Three dimensional motion analysis offers an ideal method for objectively obtaining biomechanical gait data from stroke patients, however there are a number of major barriers to its use in routine clinical practice. One significant problem is the way in which the biomechanical data generated by these systems is presented. Through the careful design of bespoke biomechanical visualisation software it may be possible to present such data in novel ways to improve clinical decision making, track progress and increase patient understanding in the context of ankle-foot orthosis tuning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 157 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 21%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 49 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 30 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 19%
Engineering 17 10%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 56 35%