↓ Skip to main content

Mutational signature distribution varies with DNA replication timing and strand asymmetry

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutational signature distribution varies with DNA replication timing and strand asymmetry
Published in
Genome Biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13059-018-1509-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marketa Tomkova, Jakub Tomek, Skirmantas Kriaucionis, Benjamin Schuster-Böckler

Abstract

DNA replication plays an important role in mutagenesis, yet little is known about how it interacts with other mutagenic processes. Here, we use somatic mutation signatures-each representing a mutagenic process-derived from 3056 patients spanning 19 cancer types to quantify the strand asymmetry of mutational signatures around replication origins and between early and late replicating regions. We observe that most of the detected mutational signatures are significantly correlated with the timing or direction of DNA replication. The properties of these associations are distinct for different signatures and shed new light on several mutagenic processes. For example, our results suggest that oxidative damage to the nucleotide pool substantially contributes to the mutational landscape of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Together, our results indicate an interaction between DNA replication, the associated damage repair, and most mutagenic processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 25%
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 7 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Computer Science 6 4%
Mathematics 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 31 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,756,063
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,456
of 4,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,143
of 347,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#36
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.