↓ Skip to main content

Mitigating amphibian disease: strategies to maintain wild populations and control chytridiomycosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
495 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mitigating amphibian disease: strategies to maintain wild populations and control chytridiomycosis
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-8-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas C Woodhams, Jaime Bosch, Cheryl J Briggs, Scott Cashins, Leyla R Davis, Antje Lauer, Erin Muths, Robert Puschendorf, Benedikt R Schmidt, Brandon Sheafor, Jamie Voyles

Abstract

Rescuing amphibian diversity is an achievable conservation challenge. Disease mitigation is one essential component of population management. Here we assess existing disease mitigation strategies, some in early experimental stages, which focus on the globally emerging chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. We discuss the precedent for each strategy in systems ranging from agriculture to human medicine, and the outlook for each strategy in terms of research needs and long-term potential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 4%
Brazil 5 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 457 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 94 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 17%
Student > Master 82 17%
Researcher 79 16%
Other 22 4%
Other 82 17%
Unknown 54 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 277 56%
Environmental Science 70 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 2%
Other 32 6%
Unknown 65 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,376,021
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#75
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,318
of 120,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them