↓ Skip to main content

Provider costs for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and related conditions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Provider costs for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and related conditions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2538-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth D. Brouwer, David Watkins, Zachary Olson, Jane Goett, Rachel Nugent, Carol Levin

Abstract

The burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD risk conditions is rapidly increasing in low- and middle-income countries, where health systems are generally ill-equipped to manage chronic disease. Policy makers need an understanding of the magnitude and drivers of the costs of cardiovascular disease related conditions to make decisions on how to allocate limited health resources. We undertook a systematic review of the published literature on provider-incurred costs of treatment for cardiovascular diseases and risk conditions in low- and middle-income countries. Total costs of treatment were inflated to 2012 US dollars for comparability across geographic settings and time periods. This systematic review identified 60 articles and 143 unit costs for the following conditions: ischemic heart disease, non-ischemic heart diseases, stroke, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Cost data were most readily available in middle-income countries, especially China, India, Brazil, and South Africa. The most common conditions with cost studies were acute ischemic heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, stroke, and hypertension. Emerging economies are currently providing a base of cost evidence for NCD treatment that may prove useful to policy-makers in low-income countries. Initial steps to publicly finance disease interventions should take account of costs. The gaps and limitations in the current literature include a lack of standardized reporting as well as sparse evidence from low-income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 254 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 19%
Researcher 41 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 63 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 71 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,426,876
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,775
of 14,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,763
of 387,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#103
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.