↓ Skip to main content

The economic impact of epilepsy: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The economic impact of epilepsy: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Neurology, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12883-015-0494-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina Allers, Beverley M. Essue, Maree L. Hackett, Janani Muhunthan, Craig S. Anderson, Kristen Pickles, Franziska Scheibe, Stephen Jan

Abstract

In this review we aimed to determine the economic impact of epilepsy and factors associated with costs to individuals and health systems. A narrative systematic review of incidence and case series studies with prospective consecutive patient recruitment and economic outcomes published before July 2014 were retrieved from Medline, Embase and PsycInfo. Of 322 studies reviewed, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria and 14 were from high income country settings. The total costs associated with epilepsy varied significantly in relation to the duration and severity of the condition, response to treatment, and health care setting. Where assessed, 'out of pocket' costs and productivity losses were found to create substantial burden on households which may be offset by health insurance. However, populations covered ostensibly for the upfront costs of care can still bear a significant economic burden. Epilepsy poses a substantial economic burden for health systems and individuals and their families. There is uncertainty over the degree to which private health insurance or social health insurance coverage provides adequate protection from the costs of epilepsy. Future research is required to examine the role of different models of care and insurance programs in protecting against economic hardship for this condition, particularly in low and middle income settings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 251 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 16%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 9%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 64 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 26%
Neuroscience 27 11%
Engineering 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 54 21%
Unknown 73 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,469,234
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#847
of 2,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,712
of 386,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#22
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.