↓ Skip to main content

An approach to addressing governance from a health system framework perspective

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
471 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An approach to addressing governance from a health system framework perspective
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-11-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inez Mikkelsen-Lopez, Kaspar Wyss, Don de Savigny

Abstract

As countries strive to strengthen their health systems in resource constrained contexts, policy makers need to know how best to improve the performance of their health systems. To aid these decisions, health system stewards should have a good understanding of how health systems operate in order to govern them appropriately. While a number of frameworks for assessing governance in the health sector have been proposed, their application is often hindered by unrealistic indicators or they are overly complex resulting in limited empirical work on governance in health systems. This paper reviews contemporary health sector frameworks which have focused on defining and developing indicators to assess governance in the health sector. Based on these, we propose a simplified approach to look at governance within a common health system framework which encourages stewards to take a systematic perspective when assessing governance. Although systems thinking is not unique to health, examples of its application within health systems has been limited. We also provide an example of how this approach could be applied to illuminate areas of governance weaknesses which are potentially addressable by targeted interventions and policies. This approach is built largely on prior literature, but is original in that it is problem-driven and promotes an outward application taking into consideration the major health system building blocks at various levels in order to ensure a more complete assessment of a governance issue rather than a simple input-output approach. Based on an assessment of contemporary literature we propose a practical approach which we believe will facilitate a more comprehensive assessment of governance in health systems leading to the development of governance interventions to strengthen system performance and improve health as a basic human right.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 452 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 109 23%
Researcher 69 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 10%
Other 28 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 93 20%
Unknown 98 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 28%
Social Sciences 75 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 22 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 3%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 108 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,753,240
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,379
of 17,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,178
of 246,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#58
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.