You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Resources for the design of CRISPR gene editing experiments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0823-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel B. Graham, David E. Root |
Abstract |
CRISPR-based approaches have quickly become a favored method to perturb genes to uncover their functions. Here, we review the key considerations in the design of genome editing experiments, and survey the tools and resources currently available to assist users of this technology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | 39% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Andorra | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 63% |
Scientists | 16 | 35% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 646 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 1% |
Unknown | 625 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 150 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 134 | 21% |
Student > Master | 85 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 73 | 11% |
Other | 27 | 4% |
Other | 82 | 13% |
Unknown | 95 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 215 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 211 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 4% |
Engineering | 16 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 2% |
Other | 54 | 8% |
Unknown | 110 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,064,191
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#760
of 4,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,518
of 395,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#26
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.