↓ Skip to main content

“You can tell by the way I use my walk.” Predicting the presence of cognitive load with gait measurements

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“You can tell by the way I use my walk.” Predicting the presence of cognitive load with gait measurements
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12938-018-0555-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pritika Dasgupta, Jessie VanSwearingen, Ervin Sejdic

Abstract

There is considerable evidence that a person's gait is affected by cognitive load. Research in this field has implications for understanding the relationship between motor control and neurological conditions in aging and clinical populations. Accordingly, this pilot study evaluates the cognitive load based on gait accelerometry measurements of the walking patterns of ten healthy individuals (18-35 years old). Data points were collected using six triaxial accelerometer sensors and treadmill pressure reports. Stride and window extraction methods were used to process these data points and separate into statistical features. A binary classification was created by using logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, and learning vector quantization to classify cognitive load vs. no cognitive load. Within and between subjects, a cognitive load was predicted with accuracy values ranged of 0.93-1 by all four models. Various feature selection methods demonstrated that only 2-20 variables could be used to achieve similar levels of accuracies. Coupling sensors with machine learning algorithms to detect the most minute changes in gait patterns, most of which are too subtle to identify with the human eye, may have a remarkable impact on the potential to detect potential neuromotor illnesses and fall risks. In doing so, we can open a new window to human health and safety prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Unspecified 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 35 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 38 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,621,305
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#119
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,888
of 337,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.