You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving care by understanding the way we work: human factors and behavioural science in the context of intensive care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc7787 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nick Sevdalis, Stephen J Brett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 30% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,210
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,235
of 104,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.