You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic analysis for rs2280205 (A>G) and rs2276961 (T>C) in SLC2A9 polymorphism for the susceptibility of gout in Cameroonians: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-018-3333-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan René Nkeck, Madeleine Singwé Ngandeu, Vicky Ama Moor, Jériel Pascal Nkeck, Jean-Pierre Chedjou, Aude Laetitia Ndoadoumgue, Wilfred F. Mbacham |
| Abstract |
To determine the association of non-synonymous variants rs2280205 and rs2276961 of the SLC2A9 gene to gout in Cameroonians. In a case-control study including 30 patients with acute gout matched to 30 healthy volunteers. We searched for polymorphism of the targeted variants using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism following polymerize chain reaction. Fisher exact test and Student t-test were used to compare variables, with a threshold of significance set at 0.05. The mean age of participants was 58 ± 8 years with 28 (93%) males. The family history of gout was found in one-third of the cases (p > 0.05). Uricemia was higher in cases than controls (p < 0.001) but 24 h urate excretion was similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Ancestral alleles (G and C) and their homozygous genotypes (GG and CC) of the targeted variants were predominant in both groups (p < 0.001). The polymorphisms of targeted variants were not associated with gout, and do not influence uric acid concentration in blood and urine. Non-synonymous variants rs2280205 and rs2276961 are not associated with gout in Cameroonians. However, the hereditary component of the disease suggests the influence of other genetic and/or environmental factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,292
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,584
of 4,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,703
of 329,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#80
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.