Report for: The microbiome quality control project: baseline study design and future directions

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Title	The microbiome quality control project: baseline study design and future directions
Published in	Genome Biology (Online Edition), December 2015
DOI	10.1186/s13059-015-0841-8
Pubmed ID	26653756
Authors	Rashmi Sinha, Christian C. Abnet, Owen White, Rob Knight, Curtis Huttenhower
Abstract	Microbiome research has grown exponentially over the past several years, but studies have been difficult to reproduce across investigations. Relevant variation in measurements between laboratories, from a variety of sources, has not been systematically assessed. This is coupled with a growing concern in the scientific community about the lack of reproducibility in biomedical research. The Microbiome Quality Control project (MBQC) was initiated to identify sources of variation in microbiome studies, to quantify their magnitudes, and to assess the design and utility of different positive and negative control strategies. Here we report on the first MBQC baseline study project and workshop.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	12	20%
United Kingdom	9	15%
France	6	10%
Canada	3	5%
Netherlands	3	5%
Australia	3	5%
Portugal	1	2%
Germany	1	2%
Norway	1	2%
Other	4	7%
Unknown	18	30%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Scientists	36	59%
Members of the public	22	36%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	2	3%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	1	2%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	8	2%
Germany	2	<1%
Brazil	2	<1%
Canada	2	<1%
Norway	1	<1%
Portugal	1	<1%
United Kingdom	1	<1%
Belgium	1	<1%
New Zealand	1	<1%
Other	0	0%
Unknown	330	95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	75	21%
Researcher	75	21%
Student > Master	49	14%
Student > Bachelor	23	7%
Professor > Associate Professor	20	6%
Other	61	17%
Unknown	46	13%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	130	37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	68	19%
Medicine and Dentistry	25	7%
Immunology and Microbiology	23	7%
Computer Science	11	3%
Other	40	11%
Unknown	52	15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.

All research outputs

#671,592

of 21,144,390 outputs

Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)

#533

of 4,011 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#14,751

of 400,597 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)

#50

of 292 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 21,144,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 4,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.

The microbiome quality control project: baseline study design and future directions

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context