Title |
Self-tracking the microbiome: where do we go from here?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microbiome, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40168-015-0138-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carine Gimbert, François-Joseph Lapointe |
Abstract |
The quantified self community brings together enthusiasts who are using technological devices to monitor their health and social media to share their personal data with others online. In light of the growing popularity of this movement, self-trackers are challenging the health-care system by raising important questions about data ownership and risk-taking. As we enter a new era of consumer genomics, a significant number of quantified self (QS) individuals are now interested in the monitoring of their microbiome and performing personal interventions. In this paper, we discuss the scientific validity of experiments involving serial observations of a single individual as opposed to randomized clinical trials. We look at self-tracking from an ethical standpoint by questioning the risks and assessing the potential benefits for personalized medicine in general and for microbiome research in particular. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
Canada | 4 | 8% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 65% |
Scientists | 13 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 17% |
Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 29% |
Unknown | 22 | 27% |