You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genes reveal traces of common recent demographic history for most of the Uralic-speaking populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-018-1522-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristiina Tambets, Bayazit Yunusbayev, Georgi Hudjashov, Anne-Mai Ilumäe, Siiri Rootsi, Terhi Honkola, Outi Vesakoski, Quentin Atkinson, Pontus Skoglund, Alena Kushniarevich, Sergey Litvinov, Maere Reidla, Ene Metspalu, Lehti Saag, Timo Rantanen, Monika Karmin, Jüri Parik, Sergey I. Zhadanov, Marina Gubina, Larisa D. Damba, Marina Bermisheva, Tuuli Reisberg, Khadizhat Dibirova, Irina Evseeva, Mari Nelis, Janis Klovins, Andres Metspalu, Tõnu Esko, Oleg Balanovsky, Elena Balanovska, Elza K. Khusnutdinova, Ludmila P. Osipova, Mikhail Voevoda, Richard Villems, Toomas Kivisild, Mait Metspalu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 13% |
| Sweden | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Finland | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Estonia | 1 | 2% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 74% |
| Scientists | 12 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 23% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#429,710
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#225
of 4,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,077
of 352,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#8
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.