You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endotoxemia-induced inflammation and the effect on the human brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc9001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark van den Boogaard, Bart P Ramakers, Nens van Alfen, Sieberen P van der Werf, Wilhelmina F Fick, Cornelia W Hoedemaekers, Marcel M Verbeek, Lisette Schoonhoven, Johannes G van der Hoeven, Peter Pickkers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 23% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 36% |
| Psychology | 15 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#6,383
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,602
of 104,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#45
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.