You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sporogony and sporozoite rates of avian malaria parasites in wild Culex pipiens pallens and C. inatomii in Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13071-015-1251-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyeongsoon Kim, Yoshio Tsuda |
| Abstract |
Malaria infection in mosquitoes is traditionally detected by microscopic examination for Plasmodium oocysts and sporozoites. Although PCR is now widely used, the presence of parasite DNA in a mosquito does not prove that sporogony is achieved. Thus, detection of sporozoites by microscopy is still required to definitively identify vector mosquitoes. The aim of this study was to confirm sporogony of avian Plasmodium spp. in Culex pipiens pallens and C. inatomii caught from the wild. Mosquitoes collected at two sites in Japan were dissected and examined by microscopy for Plasmodium oocysts and sporozoites. DNA was extracted from the midgut and salivary gland of infected mosquitoes, and the infecting Plasmodium species was identified by sequencing 478 bp of cytochrome b. Oocysts, or both oocysts and sporozoites, were found in 3.94 and 0.46 % of C. p. pallens and C. inatomii, respectively. Four (CXPIP09, GRW4, GRW11 and SGS1) and three cytochrome b lineages (CXINA01, CXINA02 and CXQUI01) were confirmed to achieve sporogony in C. p. pallens and C. inatomii, respectively. One mosquito each of C. p. pallens and C. inatomii was co-infected with two different Plasmodium lineages. These findings demonstrate that C. p. pallens and C. inatomii are natural vectors of four and three lineages of avian Plasmodium spp., respectively. The data indicate that a systematic procedure combining microscopy and PCR is a feasible and reliable approach to identify natural vectors of wildlife malaria. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lithuania | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 41% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,242,730
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,825
of 5,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,227
of 390,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#74
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.