↓ Skip to main content

Syphilis reinfection is associated with an attenuated immune profile in the same individual: a prospective observational cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Syphilis reinfection is associated with an attenuated immune profile in the same individual: a prospective observational cohort study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12879-018-3399-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Kenyon, Kara Krista Osbak, Tania Crucitti, Luc Kestens

Abstract

Ascertaining if the clinical and immunological response to repeat syphilis differs from that in initial syphilis may assist in designing optimal syphilis screening strategies and vaccine design. We prospectively recruited 120 patients with a new diagnosis of (baseline) syphilis. During a 24-month follow-up period, 11 of these patients had a further diagnosis of (repeat) syphilis. We conducted a paired comparison of their plasma cyto-chemokines at baseline and repeat syphilis. Comparing to their baseline infection, paired analyses of the 11 individuals with repeat infections during follow-up revealed that these reinfections had lower concentrations of Interferon (IFN)α (0.8 [Interquartile range (IQR) 0.8-0.8 vs. 12.2 [IQR 1.6-24.2], P = 0.004) and Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL) 4 (0.9 [IQR 0.9-12.2 vs. 17.5 [IQR 4.9-32.8], P = 0.022]. In this small study of 11 individuals, repeat syphilis was found to present with an attenuated immune response. The relevance of these findings to the design of optimal syphilis screening programs is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 24%
Other 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,844,069
of 24,766,831 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,925
of 8,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,564
of 346,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#68
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,766,831 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.