↓ Skip to main content

Biocompatibility and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of carbon nanotube yarn neural electrodes in a rat model

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biocompatibility and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of carbon nanotube yarn neural electrodes in a rat model
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12938-015-0113-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Guo, Wanru Duan, Chao Ma, Changqing Jiang, Yikuan Xie, Hongwei Hao, Renzhi Wang, Luming Li

Abstract

Implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes is a landmark therapy for movement disorders and some mental conditions. Compared to conventional platinum-iridium (Pt-Ir) electrodes, carbon nanotube yarns (CNTY) electrodes have improved stability and interface characteristics with less distortion during high field strength MRI. Sprague-Dawley rat models were used to examine thein vivo histological and imaging properties of biocompatible CNTY throughout the subacute period. Sprague-Dawley rats received CNTY (n = 16) or Pt-Ir control (n = 16) electrodes. Behavioral markers, body weight, and survival were recorded. Comparative histology (HE, NeuN, CD68, and GFAP) was performed at 1, 6, and 12 weeks post-implantation; 3.0T MRI was performed at 1 and 12 weeks. Of 32 rats, 30 (15 per group) survived implantation without reduced activity, paralysis, or incapacity to feed. Following implantation, progressive decreases in macrophage activation and neuron-depleted margins surrounding electrodes were observed in both groups. Inflammatory marker expression (CD68) was significantly lower in rats with implanted CNTY electrodes compared to controls at all time points. CNTY electrodes also caused less inflammation and shallower depths of macrophage penetration and neural disruption relative to the interface. Artifacts and distortion were observed on MRI of Pt-Ir but not CNTY electrodes. CNTY electrodes exhibited reduced inflammatory margins compared to Pt-Ir electrodes throughout the subacute period, indicating reduced initial trauma, better overall biocompatibility, and reduced fibrous tissue formation. Coupled with less MRI distortion, CNTY electrodes may be useful alternatives when there is a need to monitor electrode placement by MRI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 24%
Materials Science 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 21 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#459
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,977
of 396,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.