Title |
Development of gut inflammation in mice colonized with mucosa-associated bacteria from patients with ulcerative colitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Gut Pathogens, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13099-015-0080-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhengyu Du, Tomas Hudcovic, Jakub Mrazek, Hana Kozakova, Dagmar Srutkova, Martin Schwarzer, Helena Tlaskalova-Hogenova, Martin Kostovcik, Miloslav Kverka |
Abstract |
Disturbances in the intestinal microbial community (i.e. dysbiosis) or presence of the microbes with deleterious effects on colonic mucosa has been linked to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. However the role of microbiota in induction and progression of ulcerative colitis (UC) has not yet been fully elucidated. Three lines of human microbiota-associated (HMA) mice were established by gavage of colon biopsy from three patients with active UC. The shift in microbial community during its transferring from humans to mice was analyzed by next-generation sequencing using Illumina MiSeq sequencer. Spontaneous or dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis and microbiota composition profiling in germ-free mice and HMA mice over 3-4 generations were assessed to decipher the features of the distinctive and crucial events occurring during microbial colonization and animal reproduction. None of the HMA mice developed colitis spontaneously. When treated with DSS, mice in F4 generation of one line of colonized mice (aHMA) developed colitis. Compared to the DSS-resistant earlier generations of aHMA mice, the F4 generation have increased abundance of Clostridium difficile and decrease abundance of C. symbiosum in their cecum contents measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing. In our study, mucosa-associated microbes of UC patients were not able to induce spontaneous colitis in gnotobiotic BALB/c mice but they were able to increase the susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis, once the potentially deleterious microbes found a suitable niche. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
Researcher | 16 | 17% |
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 26% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 24 | 26% |