You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to engage patients in research and quality improvement in community-based primary care settings: protocol for a participatory action research pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-018-0113-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Haesebaert, Isabelle Samson, Hélène Lee-Gosselin, Sabrina Guay-Bélanger, Jean-François Proteau, Guy Drouin, Chantal Guimont, Luc Vigneault, Annie Poirier, Priscille-Nice Sanon, Geneviève Roch, Marie-Ève Poitras, Annie LeBlanc, France Légaré |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 9 | 22% |
| Australia | 7 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 56% |
| Scientists | 13 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,571,584
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#126
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,907
of 355,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.