You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The feasibility of following up prisoners, with mental health problems, after release: a pilot trial employing an innovative system, for engagement and retention in research, with a harder-to-engage population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-018-2911-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cath Quinn, Richard Byng, Deborah Shenton, Cordet Smart, Susan Michie, Amy Stewart, Rod Taylor, Mike Maguire, Tirril Harris, Jenny Shaw |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 18% |
| Psychology | 26 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 62 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,659,430
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,774
of 6,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,655
of 344,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#94
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.