↓ Skip to main content

The feasibility of following up prisoners, with mental health problems, after release: a pilot trial employing an innovative system, for engagement and retention in research, with a harder-to-engage…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The feasibility of following up prisoners, with mental health problems, after release: a pilot trial employing an innovative system, for engagement and retention in research, with a harder-to-engage population
Published in
Trials, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2911-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cath Quinn, Richard Byng, Deborah Shenton, Cordet Smart, Susan Michie, Amy Stewart, Rod Taylor, Mike Maguire, Tirril Harris, Jenny Shaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 43 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 20%
Psychology 24 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 48 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,448,353
of 14,116,115 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,981
of 3,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,024
of 271,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,116,115 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them